Vaccine coverup - US Medics admit role

A New York Times article openly admits the following:

1. The medical community is fully aware of the dangerous side effects of vaccines.

2. Departments involved in the vaccination process should not be assigned the duty to probe vaccine related deaths.

3. This move is being opposed as critics from WITHIN the medical community arguing for stricter probes say that handing a medical agency the probe is like, "the fox guarding the hen house". The medical community will not admit vaccines are dangerous.

4. There exists a heavily guarded "Vaccine safety datalink" containing SEVEN MILLION cases of reported vaccine damages. Even doctors probing vaccine dangers are not being allowed access to this database.

5. The studies and probes, though backed by the medical community itself, face resistance and have not made significant headway despite efforts since 2003.

6. The official version continues to be that "there is no link between thimerosal and autism.

http://query.nytimes.com/gst/health/article-page.html?res=9D0CEED9173DF936A15751C0A9639C8B63&fta=y

Subjects in Human Research

Tuesday, November 22, 2005

Public Comment Period for this rule Closes
December 12, 2005

Public comments are now being accepted by the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) on its newly proposed federal regulation regarding the testing of chemicals and pesticides on human subjects. On August 2, 2005, Congress had mandated the EPA create a rule that permanently bans chemical testing on pregnant women and children. But the EPA's newly proposed rule, misleadingly titled "Protections for Subjects in Human Research," puts industry profits ahead of children's welfare. The rule allows for government and industry scientists to treat children as human guinea pigs in chemical experiments in the following situations:

1. Children who "cannot be reasonably consulted," such as those that are mentally handicapped or orphaned newborns may be tested on. With permission from the institution or guardian in charge of the individual, the child may be exposed to chemicals for the sake of research.
2. Parental consent forms are not necessary for testing on children who have been neglected or abused.
3. Chemical studies on any children outside of the U.S. are acceptable.

http://www.organicconsumers.org/epa6.cfm
_

http://www.demaction.org/dia/organizations/oca/campaign.jsp?