how much to part with a bit of your soul ... ?
Any grand strategist will take delight in having his or her plans referred to as "conspiracy" for then, anyone who speaks of those plans is labelled "FOOL" after which the *strategy* can be conducted, and is allowed to evolve, more privately.
One of the most serious questions can be asked by anyone who doubts existence of a so-called "ruling elite" is:
How can such a *conspiracy* be so far-reaching and insidious ?
Formation of The United States of America, with Delaration of Independence and Constitution, is the clearest and most recent example (point me to another) of people breaking free from religious and *regal* rule.
It should not take any particular genius to comprehend that our *declaration* of defiance did not sit well with what can be considered the most powerful Crown on this earth - one which is related to most other crowns long since.
Certain traditions are closely held in all families. Who better to most closely hold such traditions than the most powerful families which can not only maintain, but provide *defense* for, the very properties and institutions in which *trappings* of those traditions are housed, and in that way passed on to succeeding generations ?
So it seems to me to follow without surprise that such hatred of American Freedom would outlive those with whom it began, following into "nextgen" members and anyone else willing to receive a pound (or a dollar) in exchange for a bit of soul, as it were.
"Free market" is a term I have always heard as "fishy" - *free* not meaning free is not new with the Internet, after all. "Free trade" in a "free market" economy comes with certain costs, which I have noticed an unwillingness to address among supporters of "free trade" ... have you ?
As I was listening to "Markets and Society, Part Five" (mp3) it occurred to me that the "free market economy" may be one of the best ways to exemplify the convoluted *takeover* we are living through - the deconstruction of America, of our way of life in the USA.
Free markets and the "free movement of money" were not popular with Americans when those ideas were "introduced" as I recall.
At the same time, free markets and the "free movement of money" were necessary to bring about REGULATION of "free movement of money" - no movement, nothing to regulate, eh ?
Regulation of $$ was not the goal, though - regulation of you and me ! Without that "free trade" after all, how do you feed your family ? With a GE crop maybe ? Be sure to save the seeds : )
The "environmental movement" taken by itself, cannot be anything but good - what after all can be bad about responsible stewardship of our planet ... ?
... but combined with an overriding aim to cloud the American "greenhouse" and pollute beyond saving the "hotbed" of inventiveness thriving in American "soil" then "free trade" becomes the *out* when environmental regulations cripple, or at least sufficiently hamper, American industry, for which a timetable was already in place prior to WWII for *Zero Growth*
Traumas, " ... to make sure that what happened in the 1930s would not happen again." Of course ! ... traumas of war, violations of our own freedoms and rights, trauma of our silent acceptance of our elected leaders acting illegally "in our name" - assassinating foreign leaders, invading sovereign countries, experimenting with increasingly destructive weapons "in our name" ...
... the very "spontaneous" movements, such as Environmentalism (another ism), are themselves subverted with violence, so as to cause new layers of dissension and confusion at home, to further demoralize and keep ineffective ANY possibility of real change or solutions to grave problems; cancelled out by continuing wars which do more to pollute the planet in ways we individuals cannot.
All the while, someone profits when we are maimed, profits from our sickness, even profits from our death.
None of these events have come about as result of "freedom" of any kind among The People.
.
One of the most serious questions can be asked by anyone who doubts existence of a so-called "ruling elite" is:
How can such a *conspiracy* be so far-reaching and insidious ?
Formation of The United States of America, with Delaration of Independence and Constitution, is the clearest and most recent example (point me to another) of people breaking free from religious and *regal* rule.
It should not take any particular genius to comprehend that our *declaration* of defiance did not sit well with what can be considered the most powerful Crown on this earth - one which is related to most other crowns long since.
Certain traditions are closely held in all families. Who better to most closely hold such traditions than the most powerful families which can not only maintain, but provide *defense* for, the very properties and institutions in which *trappings* of those traditions are housed, and in that way passed on to succeeding generations ?
So it seems to me to follow without surprise that such hatred of American Freedom would outlive those with whom it began, following into "nextgen" members and anyone else willing to receive a pound (or a dollar) in exchange for a bit of soul, as it were.
"Free market" is a term I have always heard as "fishy" - *free* not meaning free is not new with the Internet, after all. "Free trade" in a "free market" economy comes with certain costs, which I have noticed an unwillingness to address among supporters of "free trade" ... have you ?
As I was listening to "Markets and Society, Part Five" (mp3) it occurred to me that the "free market economy" may be one of the best ways to exemplify the convoluted *takeover* we are living through - the deconstruction of America, of our way of life in the USA.
Free markets and the "free movement of money" were not popular with Americans when those ideas were "introduced" as I recall.
At the same time, free markets and the "free movement of money" were necessary to bring about REGULATION of "free movement of money" - no movement, nothing to regulate, eh ?
Regulation of $$ was not the goal, though - regulation of you and me ! Without that "free trade" after all, how do you feed your family ? With a GE crop maybe ? Be sure to save the seeds : )
The "environmental movement" taken by itself, cannot be anything but good - what after all can be bad about responsible stewardship of our planet ... ?
... but combined with an overriding aim to cloud the American "greenhouse" and pollute beyond saving the "hotbed" of inventiveness thriving in American "soil" then "free trade" becomes the *out* when environmental regulations cripple, or at least sufficiently hamper, American industry, for which a timetable was already in place prior to WWII for *Zero Growth*
Traumas, " ... to make sure that what happened in the 1930s would not happen again." Of course ! ... traumas of war, violations of our own freedoms and rights, trauma of our silent acceptance of our elected leaders acting illegally "in our name" - assassinating foreign leaders, invading sovereign countries, experimenting with increasingly destructive weapons "in our name" ...
... the very "spontaneous" movements, such as Environmentalism (another ism), are themselves subverted with violence, so as to cause new layers of dissension and confusion at home, to further demoralize and keep ineffective ANY possibility of real change or solutions to grave problems; cancelled out by continuing wars which do more to pollute the planet in ways we individuals cannot.
All the while, someone profits when we are maimed, profits from our sickness, even profits from our death.
None of these events have come about as result of "freedom" of any kind among The People.
.
posted by JamesB at 11:11 PM
0 Comments:
Post a Comment
<< Home